Glossary · term

Interim Measures for Administration of Anthropomorphic AI Interaction Services

The Interim Measures for Administration of Anthropomorphic AI Interaction Services are Chinese departmental rules for AI services offered to the public in China that simulate a natural person's personality, thinking patterns, and communication style while providing sustained emotional interaction through text, images, audio, or video. Effective 15 July 2026, they are binding requirements, not a voluntary framework. Coverage depends on sustained emotional interaction, not merely on being a chatbot, avatar, or generative-AI service.

Regulation2025-12-27Wave 2 · 2024Maturity: 5/5

Origin and context

CAC published a consultation draft on 27 December 2025. The final text was approved on 2 February 2026 and jointly promulgated on 10 April as Order No. 21 by CAC, NDRC, MIIT, MPS, and SAMR, taking effect on 15 July. The English canonical name follows the State Council Gazette's bilingual contents, which expressly say the Chinese version is official; the Chinese title is therefore preserved as an alias. The inherited description's `draft for 2026` status is obsolete.

Sources: s1, s2, s3

Why it matters

The Measures combine content limits, user protection, data rules, and governance processes. Providers must disclose that interaction is with AI, offer a convenient exit, issue dependency and two-hour-use reminders, protect minors, provide interaction-data copy and deletion options, and meet conditions for using sensitive interaction data in training. They also address self-harm content, extreme situations, emotional manipulation, safety assessments, and algorithm filing. AP reported that major services withdrew companion features after the effective date; that shows immediate operational impact, not comprehensive enforcement or control effectiveness.

Sources: s2, s4, s6

Example

A provider adding an emotionally supportive companion feature would first ask whether it creates the sustained emotional interaction defined by Article 2. If so, launch or major changes can trigger a safety assessment, and service design must account for registration information, AI disclosure, minor protections, dependence warnings, exit requests, data controls, and the rule's emergency-intervention duties. This is an explanatory example, not a compliance checklist: exact applicability and interaction with other Chinese laws require the authoritative Chinese text and qualified legal analysis.

Sources: s2, s4

How it differs

EU AI Act

The EU AI Act is cross-sector EU legislation; these Measures are a narrower Chinese rule for sustained emotional-interaction services. Both include transparency concepts, but their scope, institutions, obligations, and enforcement differ. Compliance with either instrument does not imply compliance with the other.

AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0

AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 is non-binding technical guidance that classifies AI risks and recommends controls. The Measures are an operative order imposing duties on a defined service class. They are complementary Chinese governance artifacts, not editions, aliases, or proof that recommended or required safeguards are effective.

Maturity and evidence

Maturity is 5 because the instrument is a final, binding rule in force, published as a five-agency order and independently reported as affecting live services. The rating describes legal institutionalization, not policy wisdom, user acceptance, clinical validation, consistent enforcement, or the effectiveness of any mandated safeguard.

Sources: s2, s3, s5, s6

Limits and open questions

Not every chatbot, AI companion, or digital human is covered: Article 2 excludes customer service, knowledge Q&A, work assistants, education, and research when they do not involve sustained emotional interaction. A separate April 2026 draft governs digital virtual human information services by reference to a human-like virtual image and expressly addresses overlap; it is not an alias or a final replacement for these Measures. Translations vary, the Chinese text controls, and this page is neither legal advice nor mental-health guidance.

Sources: s2, s3, s7

Related terms

References

Last updated: 2026-09-07

In the Skills Atlas

This term is also covered in the Skills Atlas as ai risk management skill.

In the Skills Atlas

This term is also covered in the Skills Atlas as ai guardrails skill.

In the Skills Atlas

This term is also covered in the Skills Atlas as eu ai act compliance skill.