Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence

The 2024 Global Digital Compact committed Member States to create the Panel, and A/RES/79/325 formally established it on 26 August 2025. The General Assembly appointed 40 members on 12 February 2026 from a Secretary-General shortlist drawn from more than 2,600 candidates. Members elected Maria Ressa and Yoshua Bengio as co-chairs at their first virtual plenary on 3 March. The Panel released a Preliminary Report on 1 July and presented it at the first Global Dialogue that month. Bengio co-chairs the body; he did not author or found it.

Sources: s1, s2, s3, s4, s5, s9

The Panel is designed to give governments with unequal technical capacity a shared evidence base for international discussion. Its broad remit reaches beyond frontier-model safety to economic, social, cultural, environmental and human-rights impacts, and its reports feed the separate Global Dialogue. That route may shape agendas and capacity-building, but a Panel finding is neither a negotiated UN position nor a binding rule. Influence must be traced through later debate and decisions rather than inferred from the Panel's global membership or institutional name.

Sources: s2, s4, s6

A policy analyst citing the July 2026 Preliminary Report should identify it as the Panel's dated scientific assessment and examine the evidence and uncertainty behind the relevant finding. They should not write that the United Nations, its Member States or the Global Dialogue adopted the finding as policy. Later use in a national rule, a Dialogue summary or a UN consultation should be documented separately, and conclusions should be revisited after the first comprehensive annual report.

Sources: s2, s4, s7

`Independent` states the Panel's formal design, not an audited outcome. Members serve personally and candidates must disclose conflicts, but independent commentators question how methods, disagreement, individual interests, donor support and secretariat influence are disclosed and managed. Those questions do not themselves prove capture. The Panel's remit excludes military AI, its outputs are non-prescriptive, and continuation of its terms of reference can be reconsidered during the 2027 Global Digital Compact review. IPCC comparisons should be treated as limited institutional analogies, not equivalence.

Sources: s2, s6, s7